I really enjoyed this lesson on LGBTQ theory. One of the major points that I think is important is that this theory truly accounts for diverse pathways to family formation, structure and development. As a result, in the same spirit, it is important not to lump all LGBTQ families into one pot. Recognizing that each family is unique in its own ways, much as was covered in understanding diverse families, is part of what allows the theory to be flexible and continuously relevant.
Another key takeaway was embedded in the lecture regarding queer theory. This theory questions “heteronormativity”, questions the heterosexual/homosexual binary, and unpacks hidden assumptions about “normal” families and “good” parents. I think one evident example is captured in the quote shown in the photo below: "Asking who's the 'man' and who's the 'woman' in a same-sex relationship is like asking which chopstick is the fork."
I think this quote perfectly demonstrates an ongoing tendency for individuals (even those who accept lesbian/gay couples) to describe and understand them through the lens of heterosexuality. Subscribing gender attributes, associating with traditional gender roles, and similar heteronormative approaches strip a person of their individuality because not all people fall into distinct and complementary genders (man and woman) with natural roles in life.
No comments:
Post a Comment